[gopher] Re: RFC drafts

[Benn Newman <newmanbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:05:11AM -0700, JumpJet Mailbox wrote:
> Persons seriously interested in giving input about how Gopher will be 
> officially codified in the RFCs should examine and respond to the authors of 
> documents:
>    
>   draft-hoffman-gopher-uri-03.txt
>   draft-murali-url-gopher.txt
>    
>   Both of these documents are available on JumpJet ( 
> gopher://home.jumpjet.info/11\Begin_Here\References ).  These RFCs will be as 
> important to the Gopher community as RFC1436, and it is imperative that they 
> be addressed while still in final draft stage.  
Those are *old*. What exactly do they change about the way we (try) to do 
things? I noticed some Gopher+ stuff but nothing else of much interest.
-- 
Benn Newman | newmanbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | gopher://igneous-rock.homeunix.net
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkR/W/0ACgkQFE65lPR8xrG++wCfaGq/L8+X+q8D0wVseh3Peudl
YCoAnjC/vRr0iuQhu3efoI9Qo+uPPu2c
=u5ya
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----