[gopher] Re: RFC drafts
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:05:11AM -0700, JumpJet Mailbox wrote:
> Persons seriously interested in giving input about how Gopher will be
> officially codified in the RFCs should examine and respond to the authors of
> documents:
>
> draft-hoffman-gopher-uri-03.txt
> draft-murali-url-gopher.txt
>
> Both of these documents are available on JumpJet (
> gopher://home.jumpjet.info/11\Begin_Here\References ). These RFCs will be as
> important to the Gopher community as RFC1436, and it is imperative that they
> be addressed while still in final draft stage.
Those are *old*. What exactly do they change about the way we (try) to do
things? I noticed some Gopher+ stuff but nothing else of much interest.
--
Benn Newman | newmanbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | gopher://igneous-rock.homeunix.net
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkR/W/0ACgkQFE65lPR8xrG++wCfaGq/L8+X+q8D0wVseh3Peudl
YCoAnjC/vRr0iuQhu3efoI9Qo+uPPu2c
=u5ya
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [gopher] Re: RFC drafts,
Benn Newman <=
|
|