Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: gopher: January 2006:
[gopher] Re: PyGopherd and Gopher+

[gopher] Re: PyGopherd and Gopher+

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gopher] Re: PyGopherd and Gopher+
From: "R.A.Pavlov" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:30:30 +0300
Reply-to: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> Let's think about a few other things.
>  * MIME types and encodings are more complex than they may appear.

Okay, I rather meant "charset", not encoding

>    not the object the refers to it.  IE sometimes looks at the
>    extension of a file to determine what sort of file it is, and this
>    is generally considered a bug.
>    By doing this, we could also reform the gopher:// URL schema.

Another question is, how do we conform traditional gopher items to
new-style mime-types?

Are gopher items just left for backward compatibility?

> -- John

Yours, etc.
        Roman A. Pavlov


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]