[gopher] Re: "groxies"

[Cameron Kaiser <spectre@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > This would work fine for Gopher+ servers, but non-Gopher+ servers would
> > probably see the groxy-host\tport portion as a request (Bucktooth, for
> > example, would definitely get confused).

> No, because this is a request being specifically sent to a proxy, not a 
> server.  Clients will need to know when they're sending the data to a 
> proxy, but the server should never see data come in this form.

True, fair enough. If no one else has any other concerns over this method
of implementing a groxy, I'll throw together a proof-of-concept.

-- 
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
 Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-- My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I'm still right. -------