Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: gopher: March 2004:
[gopher] Re: "groxies"
Home

[gopher] Re: "groxies"

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gopher] Re: "groxies"
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:54:52 -0800 (PST)
Reply-to: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> > This would work fine for Gopher+ servers, but non-Gopher+ servers would
> > probably see the groxy-host\tport portion as a request (Bucktooth, for
> > example, would definitely get confused).

> No, because this is a request being specifically sent to a proxy, not a 
> server.  Clients will need to know when they're sending the data to a 
> proxy, but the server should never see data come in this form.

True, fair enough. If no one else has any other concerns over this method
of implementing a groxy, I'll throw together a proof-of-concept.

-- 
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
 Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-- My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I'm still right. -------


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]