[gopher] Re: Bucktooth and UMN gopher
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
The thing is, though, that it is perfectly valid to reply to a Gopher+
request with a Gopher0 menu. You could reply to UMN gopher with the
regular gopher0 menu that you reply to other things with.
That said, I'll take a look at the behavior for the next release.
-- John
Cameron Kaiser <spectre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > I remember I was trying to figure this out last year. If I remember
> > correctly, it's because UMN gopher first attempts a Gopher+ request,
> > and falls back to a Gopher request if that fails. Most Gopher(non-+)
> > servers will either fail, or return a standard Gopher directory when
> > given a Gopher+ request. Floodgap's server notices that it's a
> > Gopher+ request and returns a menu that contains a single entry
> > which points to the root as a standard Gopher.
>
> Correct. TTBOMK, only UMN gopher has this behaviour, and the patch I put
> in Bucktooth is specially for it (and any others that might be lurking).
>
> --
> ----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/
> --
> Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -- I'm a dyslexic amateur orthinologist. I just love word-botching.
> -----------
>
--
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG: 0x8A1D9A1F www.complete.org
|
|