[FreeCiv-Java] Re: XPM versus PNG
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Hi Artur,
The reason I switched over to xpm was mainly that this seems to be the format
the UNIX clients are using and I wanted to avoid having to convert the images.
I didn't realize the win32 client is using png. I agree png is a far better
image format (in particular, it supports alpha blending, which works like a
charm in Java).
In addition, I was unable to get Java's built in image loaders to recognize xpm
files: I know we discussed this a (long) while back. I ended up writing my own
parser to support xpm.
It would be very easy for the client to support PNG in addition to XPM. All
that's required is to write a class implementing the Sprite interface then
alter TileSpec.loadImage( URL ) so that it recognizes the PNG / GIF / JPG
extensions and uses this implementation... In fact, I might have a go at doing
this after I'm through checking my email...
Brian
-----
I was trying to run jfreeciv client yesterday, but it turned out that
data I have downloaded with win32 client is in png format and jfreeciv
understands only xpm.
I know that there were some historical reasons, for from 1.3+, java
itself understands gif,jpg,png and xpm. It is possible to support all
these 4 formats using same code. How much work would it be to convert
current loaders to use default java image toolkit ?
Artur
- [FreeCiv-Java] Re: XPM versus PNG,
Brian Duff <=
|
|