[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#13805) Data: Suggested change of default ruler titles

["Daniel Markstedt" <himasaram@xxxxxxxx>]

<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=13805 >

2005-11-23 kl. 16.52 skrev Jason Short:

>
> <URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=13805 >
>
> Daniel Markstedt wrote:
>> <URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=13805 >
>>
>> Another suggestion:
>>
>> • Use the generic term "Leader" for Despotism. Better than the current
>> "Emperor"->"King" linguistic 'downgrade' when you move from Despotism 
>> to
>> Monarchy. Individual nations can still define their own (more 
>> powerful)
>> titles.
>
> Isn't there a unit called "Leader"?  If so then that's not an
> improvement.  However there have been many other suggestions and most 
> of
> them are better than Emperor.
>
> -jason
>
>

There's a gameloss 'Leader' unit in the default ruleset, yes. But it's 
rare and in any case an embodiment of the 'Leader', so I don't see how 
that could be a problem. The unit could be marked ?unit: for 
localizations. The other suggestions are IMHO not neutral or universal 
enough.

-Daniel