[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ruleset editing (nations)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:51:00PM +0200, Daniel Markstedt wrote:
> > contributors add there name to a contributor list placed in comments.
> > or is this unnecessary/unwanted?
> >
>
> I think we gave up on that. ;-)
Ok.
> >- geographical hints (at least some) for cities are strongly encouraged
> >
>
> Do you mean natural city names?
Yes.
> > cities should be placed in order of importance or magnificence (I assume
> > that the code uses this order if terrain information is not to be used.
> > Is this correct?)
>
> I think cities should be placed both in order of historical and modern
> importance, as well as chronological order. Otherwise, all your
> nation's famous "magnificent" cities will end up in the limited area
> that is your starting position. In reality (and in the game) a city's
> importance is decided from it's geographical position, not from early
> founding (even though that's important too.) I opt for a stronger focus
> on chronological order.
If this information is available..
Christian
--
Christian Knoke * * * http://cknoke.de
* * * * * * * * * Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.
|
|