Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2005:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#13805) Patch: Suggested change of default ruler ti
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#13805) Patch: Suggested change of default ruler ti

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: himasaram@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#13805) Patch: Suggested change of default ruler titles
From: "Peter Schaefer" <peter.schaefer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 11:52:22 -0700
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=13805 >

For Despotism, Tyrant would also work, and maybe Autarch.

Looks like there would be room for yet another goverment, the Empire ;-)

On 8/28/05, Daniel Markstedt <himasaram@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> <URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=13805 >
> 
> This patch applies on /data/default/governments.ruleset and alters the
> default ruler titles.
> 
> - Despotism becomes King/Queen.
> - Monarchy becomes Emperor/Empress
> - Anarchy becomes Citizen/Citizen
> 
> In the current ruleset, moving from Despotism (Emperor) to Monarchy
> (King) feels like a degradation. Linguistically, that is. In reality,
> an emperor is ruling a much more advanced form of government, where he
> may have several vassal kings below him. In short, King is a weaker
> title than Emperor.
> 
> The titles for Anarchy is inspired by the French Revolution, where
> kings and noblemen suddenly all became "citizens" and equal with
> everybody else. This is of course not analogous with the situation in
> the game, but I find it quite fitting.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
>





[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]