[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11562) Freeciv Server Performance

["Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=11562 >

Benoit Hudson wrote:

>>One problem though is this will still rearrange all workers even when
>>just one should be placed.
> 
> 
> I disagree with "should" here.  For CPU reasons, we want to avoid rearranging
> too much; but that's the only reason I can really think of.  If we can 
> rearrange
> all workers at acceptable CPU cost, then we should.

For human players I don't think this is true.  If a city grows in size 
all workers are rearranged by default.  But for a human player who's 
placed his workers by hand he doesn't want this - he just wants the new 
worker to be placed greedily.  This would basically replace the need for 
the CITYO_EINSTEIN and CITYO_TAXMAN options (once we have 
user-controlled server-side CM).

-jason