Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2005:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11562) Freeciv Server Performance

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11562) Freeciv Server Performance

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11562) Freeciv Server Performance
From: "Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:54:15 -0800
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: >

Benoit Hudson wrote:

>>One problem though is this will still rearrange all workers even when
>>just one should be placed.
> I disagree with "should" here.  For CPU reasons, we want to avoid rearranging
> too much; but that's the only reason I can really think of.  If we can 
> rearrange
> all workers at acceptable CPU cost, then we should.

For human players I don't think this is true.  If a city grows in size 
all workers are rearranged by default.  But for a human player who's 
placed his workers by hand he doesn't want this - he just wants the new 
worker to be placed greedily.  This would basically replace the need for 
the CITYO_EINSTEIN and CITYO_TAXMAN options (once we have 
user-controlled server-side CM).


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]