[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10722) Not enough grasslands/plains

["miguel@xxxxxxxx" <miguel@xxxxxxxx>]

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=10722 >

Not that I want to mess around, but wouldn't be 10% glacier be more than enough?


On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 03:58:03 -0800, Mike Jing <miky40@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=10722 >
> 
> > [jdorje - Fri Dec 03 09:21:52 2004]:
> >
> > Apparently this was committed to 2.0 a few weeks ago, but not to the
> > dev branch yet.  However it doesn't seem to make a big difference
> > in 2.0. Percentages of forest are down but plains and grassland
> > aren't that much higher.
> 
> It did improve things a bit, but didn't go far enough.  This is what I
> get with topology=5, steepness=10 and everything else at default (S2_0):
> 
> Glacier: 16%
> Desert: 8%
> Jungle: 3%
> Swamp: 5%
> Tundra: 4%
> Mountains: 4%
> Hills: 7%
> Forest: 20%
> Grassland: 17%
> Plains: 16%
> 
> This is what I would like to see:
> 
> Glacier: 15%
> Desert/Jungle/Swamp/Tundra/Mountains: 15% total
> Hills: 8%
> Forest: 12%
> Grassland: 25%
> Plains: 25%
> 
> So, Desert, etc. and Forest still need to be reduced, and
> Grassland/Plains increased further.  It might not be realistic, but it's
> what I think is best for gameplay.
> 
> Mike Jing
> 
> 


-- 
Miguel Farah
miguel@xxxxxxxx