Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9692) In city naval port
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9692) In city naval port

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#9692) In city naval port
From: "Marcelo Burda" <mburda@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:33:20 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=9692 >

Le ven 13/08/2004 à 14:23, Christian Knoke a écrit :
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=9692 >
> 
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 04:27:19AM -0700, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> > 
> > <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=9692 >
> > 
> > To summarize, you don't like the fact that ships can't cross from one
> > ocean into another through a city and you suggest that at some point city
> > decides which ocean it is on, so the "crossing" is prevented.
> > 
> > First, I do not see much problem in the current behaviour.
> > 
> > Second, what you propose would complicate both the user interaction and
> > the code enormously.
> > 
Maybe.
> > Third, it does not contradict the history much, as Per pointed out.
> > Another example is Vikings going to Constantinopole through Russia by boat
> > when there was no direct river connection.  In fact, settlements were
> > established in places where you can haul a boat from one river to another
> > (one example -- present day Volokolamsk).
ok for river crossing, but actual freeciv as no boat on river!
> 
> If this happens too often in Freeciv, the reason are the maps. Make the maps
> more (geographically) regular, then there will very few spots like this.
> 
> Christian
I am working primary in generator a this time. but is not so easy make
natural (irregular) an regular cost at some time! i will try ;-)
Marcelo 




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]