Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#7131) client orders to replace client goto 		Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#7131) client orders to replace client goto

[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#7131) client orders to replace client goto
From: "Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 08:58:00 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx 
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=7131 >

Arnstein Lindgard wrote:
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=7131 >
> 
> Unit pix label update bug. (Patch attached).

This is very ugly.  Use of a static variable is bug-prone.  Is it really 
necessary?

> Also, server/unithand.c:handle_unit_goto() needs to set orders so
> client can display the "G" sprite.

No, for server-side goto ACTIVITY_GOTO is used and the client should 
already display the "G" sprite.

In the future I think ACTIVITY_GOTO and server-side goto can be removed 
entirely.  I think the AI doesn't need it, and once all human goto is 
done through orders it will be unnecessary.

In fact, we could probably remove about half of the network packets once 
orders are fully implemented.  But we'll see.

jason
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]