Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: November 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6947) [Bug] is_at_coast is misleading 		Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6947) [Bug] is_at_coast is misleading

[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6947) [Bug] is_at_coast is misleading
From: "Gregory Berkolaiko" <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:00:35 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx 
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6947 >

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6947 >
> 
> Rivers can only connect in cardinal directions, and this function is
> used in situations where elements like river (movement) concerns are
> needed.

Yes, I see now.  Thanks.

> I would check carefully before changing it, but meanwhile document
> the behaviour so people do not make the mistakes you have.
> 
> Cheers,
> RossW
> =====
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]