[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4620) assertion in get_defender
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Jason Short wrote:
> Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Jason Short wrote:
> >
> >
> >>The battleship is attacking a transport. The transport's tile contains
> >>a second unit - the Mech. Inf. from an allied player that is being
> >>transported_by the transport.
> >
> >
> > This particular occurence is described in my latest email under PR#4260
>
> Calling can_unit_attack_unit_at_tile is not enough. In fact, it's
> already done. We need to call can_player_attack_tile. Or perhaps
> can_unit_attack_unit_at_tile should call this function?
>
> I'm not sure about your proposed long-term solution. Do all
> get_defender users correctly check can_player_attack_tile?
I think they should. But currently they don't.
G.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4620) assertion in get_defender,
Gregory Berkolaiko <=
|
|