[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [freeciv-data] Re: (PR#3597) german ruleset new version

["ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:23:51PM +0200, Christian Knoke wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:25:22PM +0100, Daniel Herding wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This ruleset includes Wuppertal, Barmen and Elberfeld.
> > 
> > But in fact, in 1929 Barmen and Elberfeld were united, creating
> > Wuppertal. Today, they're city quarters of Wuppertal. That's why
> > I think Barmen and Elberfeld shouldn't be included in german.ruleset.
> > 
> > http://www.martin-wuppertal.de/wuppertal/wuppertal_geschichte002.html
> > For the people who can read German.
> 
> Yes, I know this. But at some time long ago when I wanted to change it
> people complained for reasons I do not remember.
> 
> There is also a problem with Klostergrab, which AFAICS refers to a city
> which is *not* on the territory of today's germany, even when there is
> a(nother) city by that name near Dresden; the latter one too small and
> unimportant to be included in Freeciv.

Why don't we split up the german nation in different germanies?
1. Reich (Karl der Grosse 800 - 17xx)
Preussen, Bayern, Schwaben ... (-1871)
Deutsches Reich (-1945)
Bundesrepublik Deutschland

All could have different flags so i don't see small problems. Only the
big one that someone has to do it *g*

Thomas