Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3688) Upkeep in Citywindow with Adam Smith's 		Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3688) Upkeep in Citywindow with Adam Smith's

[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3688) Upkeep in Citywindow with Adam Smith's
From: "Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:58:00 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:43:41AM -0800, ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>the upkeep in the citywindow doesn't care about if we have a wonder
>>which "pays" for all buildings with cost 1.
> 
> 
> and here the patch for gui-gtk and gui-gtk2.0 (last not tested)

The patch seems obvious enough.  But is it really better to show the 
current cost rather than the normal cost?  Does anyone have a reason why 
this would be bad?

jason
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]