[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:50:41AM -0800, Raimar Falke wrote:
> >
> > I'm in favor of using C99 (instead of C89).
>
> Me too. At least this feature is supported by icc 6.0, gcc 2.96 and
> 3.2 and "Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C 5.3". The test is easy:
>
> $ cat a.c
> #define x(...) #__VA_ARGS__
>
> x(a,b)
> $ gcc -E a.c
> # 1 "a.c"
> # 1 "<built-in>"
> # 1 "<command line>"
> # 1 "a.c"
>
>
> "a,b"
> $
>
> So if you have access to other compilers please test and report the
> results.
As I recall, Solaris is the one that has issues here. Reinier will be able
to verify.
-mike
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute, (continued)
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute, Jason Short, 2003/02/27
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute, Raimar Falke, 2003/02/27
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute, Jason Short, 2003/02/27
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute, Raimar Falke, 2003/02/27
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute,
Mike Kaufman <=
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute, Reinier Post, 2003/02/27
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute, Raimar Falke, 2003/02/28
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute, Jason Short, 2003/02/28
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute, Raimar Falke, 2003/02/28
|
|