Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3427) Remove noreturn attribute
From: "Mike Kaufman" <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 06:22:50 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:50:41AM -0800, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > 
> > I'm in favor of using C99 (instead of C89).
> 
> Me too. At least this feature is supported by icc 6.0, gcc 2.96 and
> 3.2 and "Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C 5.3". The test is easy:
> 
> $ cat a.c
> #define x(...) #__VA_ARGS__
> 
> x(a,b)
> $ gcc -E a.c
> # 1 "a.c"
> # 1 "<built-in>"
> # 1 "<command line>"
> # 1 "a.c"
> 
> 
> "a,b"
> $
> 
> So if you have access to other compilers please test and report the
> results.

As I recall, Solaris is the one that has issues here. Reinier will be able
to verify.

-mike



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]