Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] use S_NO_SPECIAL (PR#1311)

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] use S_NO_SPECIAL (PR#1311)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Markus Linnala <maage@xxxxxxxxx>, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] use S_NO_SPECIAL (PR#1311)
From: Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:07:28 +0100
Reply-to: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:37:38AM +0000, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 08:08:29AM -0800, Markus Linnala wrote:
> > > 
> > > Use S_NO_SPECIAL instead of 0.
> > 
> > Attached is an updated version. Changes:
> >  - catch all such cases which are related to activity_target
> >  - change int to enum tile_special_type in cases which are related to
> >  activity_target
> The patch is very nice.  I didn't notice any wrong-doings apart from these 
> nitpicks:
> 1.
> +       secfile_lookup_int_default(file, S_NO_SPECIAL,
> +                                  "player%d.u%d.activity_target", plrno, i);
> you should probalby cast S_NO_SPECIAL  (you do cast on another occasion, 
> so be consistent).

Ok. Although the error classes are others.

> 2. Is (S_RIVER | S_ROAD) still of "enum tile_special_type" type?  I 
> remember we discussed it and I think the conclusion was that yes it is.  
> But if my memory fails me (as per usual), then there is one occurence of 
> ORing two specials...

Yes "(S_RIVER | S_ROAD)" still has the type "enum tile_special_type".

> Overall the patch is very useful.  No more wandering "so what 0 stands for 
> in this can_unit_do_activity_targeted call??".
> If it compiles and the savegames are identical, apply it straightaway.

Or compare the asm-output.


 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
  build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying
  to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
    -- Rich Cook

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]