Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] use S_NO_SPECIAL (PR#1311)

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] use S_NO_SPECIAL (PR#1311)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] use S_NO_SPECIAL (PR#1311)
From: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 03:37:53 -0800 (PST)

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Raimar Falke wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 08:08:29AM -0800, Markus Linnala wrote:
> > 
> > Use S_NO_SPECIAL instead of 0.
> Attached is an updated version. Changes:
>  - catch all such cases which are related to activity_target
>  - change int to enum tile_special_type in cases which are related to
>  activity_target

The patch is very nice.  I didn't notice any wrong-doings apart from these 
+       secfile_lookup_int_default(file, S_NO_SPECIAL,
+                                  "player%d.u%d.activity_target", plrno, i);

you should probalby cast S_NO_SPECIAL  (you do cast on another occasion, 
so be consistent).

2. Is (S_RIVER | S_ROAD) still of "enum tile_special_type" type?  I 
remember we discussed it and I think the conclusion was that yes it is.  
But if my memory fails me (as per usual), then there is one occurence of 
ORing two specials...

Overall the patch is very useful.  No more wandering "so what 0 stands for 
in this can_unit_do_activity_targeted call??".

If it compiles and the savegames are identical, apply it straightaway.


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] use S_NO_SPECIAL (PR#1311), Gregory Berkolaiko <=