[Freeciv-Dev] Re: using indent (was: Reproducable core dump (PR#1051))
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 01:08:20AM +0100, Reinier Post wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:43:30PM -0800, jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Raimar has been reformatting such comments himself - but presumably
> > _after_ he runs indent over the patch. I'd be quite willing to do this
> > part myself, but it should only be done right before the patch is
> > committed - up until that point, having indent work on the comment is
> > good; otherwise you have to reformat by hand (sometimes many times) and
> > that's way too tedious.
>
> You know, indent is not the only thing we can run the code through.
>
> perl -pei.c++ 's#//(.*\S)#/*$1 */#' foo.c
>
> (or similar) gets rid of C++-style comments.
>
> > I generally prefer this style of comment, because indent will reformat
> > it as necessary. For a project like freeciv, though, we probably want
> > to avoid such reformatting so that cvs annotate will work properly. But
> > still, it should only be done right before the patch is applied IMO.
>
> I've noticed that CVS itself can automatically run code through arbitrary
> commands at the time CVS commands are issued.
> Has anyone here experimented with that feature?
I have used it in two other projects. No problem.
> Can it smoothen this transition?
IMHO no. We should convert all code at a time.
Raimar
--
email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"We just typed make..."
-- Stephen Lambrigh, Director of Server Product Marketing at Informix,
about porting their Database to Linux
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: using indent (was: Reproducable core dump (PR#1051)),
Raimar Falke <=
|
|