[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Open patches? (PR#720)

[Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 09:43:16AM -0700, Lino Mastrodomenico wrote:
> Raimar Falke wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Lino Mastrodomenico wrote:
> > > +       "This does not apply under Democracy.  See also fulltradesize.")
> > > },
> >
> > I understand why technically this is the case. But why have you
> > excluded Democracy here?
> 
> Because I'm lazy and this is probably the way to implement it writing less 
> code! ;-)
> 
> Well... in reality this isn't a political/hardcoded decision: you can enable 
> the trade penalty under democracy simply changing the corruption_level in the 
> ruleset from 0 to 1 (this will not enable the "normal" corruption).

So what do you think if the the "trade" variable is reduced at the
start (before the first if) of city_corruption.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "Are you saying that you actually used the Classpath Java AWT classes in 
  addition to the GTK peers and got them to display something?
  Wow.  That's way better than I did and I wrote the code!"
    -- Aaron M. Renn in the classpath mailing list