[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Hi,
> > In any case, I don't see any point in rolling together the free_tech and
> > init_tech patches. They shouldn't interfere with each other.
>
> They both have a similar structure. E.g., both need to assign the techs to the
> player in the same place in the code. It eases the review burden if both get
> reviewed & applied at the same time.
I am in favour of keeping patches that are standalone and as small as
possible, but if you really want a single huge patch...
So, who's going to do this then? If I haven't done it in the next hour
or so, then I'm not going to.
Stewart.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stewart Adcock saa@xxxxxxxxxxx www.stewart-adcock.co.uk
Physical & Theoretical Chemistry, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ
Home: (0118) 959 4366 Lab: (01865) 275 933 Fax: (01865) 275 905
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_tech, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_tech, Daniel L Speyer, 2001/10/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_tech, Justin Moore, 2001/10/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_tech, Raimar Falke, 2001/10/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_tech, Daniel L Speyer, 2001/10/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_tech, Raimar Falke, 2001/10/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs, Reinier Post, 2001/10/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs, Raimar Falke, 2001/10/09
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs, Ben Webb, 2001/10/05
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs, Stewart Adcock, 2001/10/05
|
|