Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: September 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Gold Sort order (12 < 2)? (PR#949)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Gold Sort order (12 < 2)? (PR#949)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Christian Knoke <ChrisK@xxxxxxxx>, Freeciv Developers <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Gold Sort order (12 < 2)? (PR#949)
From: Paul Zastoupil <paulz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:30:11 -0700

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:45:05PM +0200, Raimar Falke wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:23:51PM +0200, Christian Knoke wrote:
> > Am Montag, 10. September 2001 20:40 schrieb Raimar Falke:
> > 
> > >
> > > Known problem. The attached patch should fix this. The sorting is
> > > also improved:
> > >  - 1st click on the Economy column: gold ascending
> > >  - 2nd click: gold descending
> > >  - 3rd click: luxury ascending
> > >  - 4th click: luxury descending
> > >  - 5th click: science ascending
> > >  - 6th click: science descending
> > >  - 7th click: gold ascending
> > >
> > > You get the idea. This also works with any other column. Fields are
> > > separated by / or (.
> > 
> > Yes, a quite good idea. Indeed, it is on my personal wishlist for long.
> > Of course it is not usefull yet, because it is hard to see
> > what is sorted and how. One possibility is maybe, put all numbers
> > in different columns (without parting line inbetween?), and
> > highlightning the header which determines the actual sort order.
> > There is enough room for this. Maybe it is possible to have
> > split column headers (e.g.:
> > 
> >      |   Surplus   |   Economy  |
> >      |  F | P | T  |  G | L | S |
> > 
> > ), too.
> 
> Second version. Works no also with the english translation. Comments?
> 

It seems a little bulky with the 'asc' 'desc'.

I think Christian Knoke meant that there should actually be an individual
column for each item.  i.e. one column for Food, one for Production and
one for Trade.  This would be rather more involved.

Also dumps when I clicked on the building column:
cityrep.c:138: failed assertion `items1_used == items2_used'


-- 
Paul Zastoupil


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]