Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: map_adjust_x (was: Profiling Civserver again)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: map_adjust_x (was: Profiling Civserver again)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx (Freeciv developers)
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: map_adjust_x (was: Profiling Civserver again)
From: Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 22:49:05 +0200

On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:12:09PM -0500, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 02:54:48PM +0200, Reinier Post wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 06:31:27PM -0500, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> > > Perhaps someone could answer this for me: why do we _have_ to assume 
> > > possible X values outside [-map.xsize,2*map.xsize] ? When would this 
> > > (legitimately) happen?
> > 
> > The screen can be much wider than the map.  The last time I tried this out
> > was 2 years ago, and the screen updating was broken then (see
> > 
> >   http://www.freeciv.org/~hop/examples/wrap1.jpg
> >   http://www.freeciv.org/~hop/examples/wrap2.jpg
> >
> > ).  With the tinydent tiles, it's easy to wrap around several times.
> 
> I get different behaviour (on gtk+): log in as "user" with the attached 
> savegame. hit return, make your civclient as wide as possible. I get a line 
> of blackness on the right side. You can still move the map by right-clicking 
> in the black (though is this the behaviour we want?) but the map does not 
> wrap around.

Yes, I just tested it again, and that is what I'm seeing, too (with Xaw):

  http://www.freeciv.org/~hop/examples/wrapbug-1.11.6.jpg

-- 
Reinier


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]