[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, 03 Jul 2001, jjm@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> At 2001/07/03 05:46 , Thue wrote:
> I, personally, like the idea of having a multi-part distribution,
> where you could pick the parts you want. We are definitely not
> there, however.
The situation wrt. VMS is precisely the same, except that the vms
directory is included in Makefile.am. If we're going to have a
multi-part distribution then we should definitely document the
practise. I think that the easiest and most robust solution is to
include the amiga files; in my experience if you try to go behind
Automake's back then things will break sooner or later.
--
Big Gaute http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~gs234/
Look DEEP into the OPENINGS!! Do you see any ELVES or EDSELS...
or a HIGHBALL??...
- [Freeciv-Dev] Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in, miguel_l_l, 2001/07/02
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in, Thue, 2001/07/02
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in, miguel_l_l, 2001/07/02
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in, Thue, 2001/07/03
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in, Jeff Mallatt, 2001/07/03
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in,
Gaute B Strokkenes <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in, Thue, 2001/07/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in, Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/07/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Bad entries in po/POTFILES.in, Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/07/11
|
|