[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [patch] readline with -lcurses (PR#772)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Saturday 19 May 2001 12:48, Gaute B Strokkenes wrote:
> On 19 May 2001, gs234@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 May 2001, thue@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >> On Saturday 19 May 2001 03:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >>> If I copy those two files from a different project, ./configure
> >>> succeeds; but then make blows up:
> >>>
> >>> ranlib libcivserver.a gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> >>> -I. -I. -I.. -I./../common -I./../ai -I../intl -g -O2 -Wall -c
> >>> civserver.c make[2]: *** No rule to make target `@INTLDEPS@',
> >>> needed by `civserver'. Stop.
> >>
> >> This is probably because debian unstable has gettext version
> >> 0.10.37-1, ie unrelated. Still would be nice to have it fixed :).
>
> I note that the civserver target in server/Makefile.am explicitly
> lists @INTLDEPS@ as a dependency. I'm unsure as to why this is done,
> since the gettext manual (version 0.10.35, which is what I have access
> to) doesn't mention this being necessary in any of the pertinent
> sections. Moreover, it seems to expand to the empty string under
> 0.10.35, so I wonder why it was added in the first place.
Looking at the code @INTLDEPS@ was exported in aclocal.m4. It seems that when
running the aclocal in my distribution a newer version of the macros is used,
which doesn't have/export it.
I tried just removing the 2 occurences of INTLDEPS and running gettextize,
and it seems to work.
I suppose the changes this creates should be put into freeciv CVS?
Will this create problems for people with older versions of gettext? I guess
they can just use the included gettext...
> In general, I think it might be a good idea to review the way we use
> gettext soon. There seem to be a lot of strange add-ons and
> irregularities when compared to what the manual advises.
-Thue
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [patch] readline with -lcurses (PR#772), Thue, 2001/05/20
|
|