[Freeciv-Dev] Re: conquer city, owner doesn't change (PR#465)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Den søn, 23 jul 2000 skrev SamBC:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Reinier Post
> >
> >
> > > [...] Allies can enter each
> > > other's cities without taking them over, which is intentional and
> > > documented. Y [...]
> >
> > Where?
> >
>
> And I should hope it is configurable or we are breaking CivII compatibility
> in a big way.
>
> Or given recent discussions on [Freeciv] should we do that deliberately ;o)
>
> *breathes a sigh of relief that that whole nasty is over*
>
> SamBC
Umm, you are welcome to implement the option :).
Seriously, it should be done at some time. The current way is much nicer
though, which is why it was done this way in the first place! (not only
me, but also the original diplomatic states patch authors)
-Thue
- [Freeciv-Dev] conquer city, owner doesn't change (PR#465), jjm, 2000/07/21
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: conquer city, owner doesn't change (PR#465), Thue, 2000/07/22
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: conquer city, owner doesn't change (PR#465), Jeff Mallatt, 2000/07/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: conquer city, owner doesn't change (PR#465), Reinier Post, 2000/07/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: conquer city, owner doesn't change (PR#465), Thue, 2000/07/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: conquer city, owner doesn't change (PR#465), SamBC, 2000/07/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: conquer city, owner doesn't change (PR#465),
Thue <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: conquer city, owner doesn't change (PR#465), SamBC, 2000/07/23
|
|