Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: copyright, again (was: New freeciv intro.xpm splash s
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: copyright, again (was: New freeciv intro.xpm splash s

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Alexandre BERAUD <a_beraud@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: copyright, again (was: New freeciv intro.xpm splash screen)
From: Arkadiusz Danilecki <szopen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:53:03 +0100 (MET)

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Alexandre BERAUD wrote:

> >That's correct. As someone pointed out, "source" is defined as
> >"a preferred form for modifications" or something, so almost
> >any image format qualifies (unless you created the picture
> >using a vector-graphics tool, in this case you'd have to
> >distribute a fig, cvg, sk, eps or something). So there is no
> >problem with GPLing images.
> 
> Do you mean I have to put the .blend file with my picture ??? And the
> parameters of the Gimp filters and so on ?

        Don't understand the question. If i gpl'd my code created with
e.g. kdeveloper, do i need to put all options an .rc with it? 
        You can gpl-ed image created with blender without providing
.blend files, imho. that means everybody can use and modify _image_. You
could put also .blend files under GPL, so everybody can modify _blend
files_.

Szopen




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]