Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: could_player_build_improvement (PR#256)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: could_player_build_improvement (PR#256)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: iquin@xxxxxxxxxx, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: could_player_build_improvement (PR#256)
From: Jeff Mallatt <jjm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:32:32 -0500

At 2000/02/06 17:50 , iquin@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Full_Name: Choy, Hung Wah (IQ)
>Version: 1.9.2
>Distribution: Built from source
>Client: Both (or N/A)
>OS: Linux
>Submission from: (NULL) (202.188.182.5)
>
>
>could_player_build_improvement() was changed to have the same
>behavior as can_player_build_improvement().
> 

Arg!  Yes.  I should've noticed this -- sorry.

Here's a patch which does not change could_player_build_improvement(), but
merely changes all references to it outside of city.c into references to
can_player_build_improvement().  This leaves
could_player_build_improvement() virtually unreferenced (just one reference
in can_player_build_improvement() in city.c), so it can be changed into
whatever it should be without much impact.

Attachment: could-can-build-revert.diff.gz
Description: Binary data

jjm

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]