[freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: classes.ruleset version 3 plus clas
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
>>>>> "Tomasz" == Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@xxxxxxxx> writes:
Tomasz> On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 09:05:20PM -0500, Saikat DebRoy
Tomasz> wrote:
>> In the classes.rulset file you have :
>>
>> indian real ancient modern asia white indian_ocean __^^^^^--
>>
>> Whatever Indians are racially, they are not white. Frankly
>> speaking, Indians in general can not be put in any of the racial
>> groupings you are using. Some are white, some are yellow (or more
>> precisely, mongoloid) but the overwhelming majority is a mixture
>> of a large number of races. If you insist on having a racial
>> group for each (real) nation, you can possibly use south asian.
Tomasz> Know, but original Aryan were white. Any better idea (two
Tomasz> races / unsure nation etc ?) ?
Why not drop the idea of color altogether ? There seems to be quite a
few people out here who find it objectionable (for various reasons).
For real nations (ancient or modern) geographic classification should
not be a problem.
|
|