[freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Nations classification again
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 04:53:00PM +0100, Robert Brady wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > 6.
> > Every real nation is in exactly one of classes :
> > white, yellow, black, indian.
> > Problems :
> > Filipinos are unclassified. I don't know what race they are.
> > Far-East Indians are not indian, but white. Blame Columbus. :-)
> Not so sure about this one.. it's hardly accurate to call Americans
> a "white" nation...
Some 70-80% are white.
> > 7.
> > Every real nation is in at least one of these regional classes :
> > europe, america, asia (read : far east), middle_east, africa or
> > oceania (incl. australia)
> > Also mediterranean and scandinavia is used for some nations.
> > Some nations are even in 3 regions at once like Egypt
> > (africa, mediterranean, middle_east).
> The mediterranean flag ought to be added to french, italians, and spanish,
> and probably the arabs.
> I'd like to see a few more of these regional classes. In particular, ones
> for oceans.
This was just first version.
> > 9.
> > Some white nations are classified into ethnic/cultural subclasses :
> > celtic, germanic, anglosaxon, semite, slavic, finno_ugric, latinate,
> > hellenic, baltic
> Scotland is probably better in anglosaxon instead of (or as well as)
Any Scot to confirm or deny ???
> In the long term (after the select-a-nation box scales better), I'd like
> to see at least the following nations added -
A flag, please.
Also anyone has flag of Tibet ???
Also we nearly hit 63-nations limit,
so only 1-3 can be added until patching source.
[freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Nations classification again, Gerhard Killesreiter, 2000/08/09