Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-ai: March 2004:
[freeciv-ai] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Re: (PR#8308) AutoReply: something fo

[freeciv-ai] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Re: (PR#8308) AutoReply: something fo

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-ai@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [freeciv-ai] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Re: (PR#8308) AutoReply: something for you
From: "Stepan Roh" <stepan@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:22:56 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: >

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Stepan Roh wrote:

> <URL: >
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Jason Short wrote:
> >
> > <URL: >
> >
> > Stepan Roh wrote:
> >
> > > That is not a spam, but worm. Bayesian filter won't help because there is
> > > almost no text in that mail (only subject and one sentence) - that can't
> > > be trained. The only solution is antivirus.
> >
> > Surely spamassassin looks at the attachment as well?  It may be binary
> > but it can still provide data to filter by...
> Bayesian filter mail classification is based on probability of words in
> certain types of documents (in our case in spam and ham). Binary
> attachments can't be analysed this way.

Sorry, I replied not to the question you wrote :-) Spamassassin can be
used to filter such viruses (by detecting some forbidden content types
or attachment names), but it looks too hard (there must be a regular
expression against undecoded mail body), but I might be wrong (I did not
try that).

Have a nice day.

Stepan Roh

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]