[freeciv-ai] Re: (PR#3663) [PATCH] The AI gets tech too quickly at the e
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:07, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
>
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Anthony J. Stuckey wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:49:32PM -0800, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> > > I would ask you to listen to "recreational" players, whose opinions are
> > > contained in Sam's email and the link he gives.
> >
> > I read both, and far more besides.
>
> Reading is not the same as listening.
>
> > > Yes, Diplomacy with non-attacking AIs will make _survival_ trivial. But
> > > it won't make winning easier: once provoked, the AI will come down on the
> > > newbie player like an avalanche, with all it's tech advantage. If not
> > > provoked, the AI will just blast off to space in 1775.
> >
> > With survival "assured", there will be far less pressure and more time
> > for learning the game. I believe that people will learn to beat the Easy
> > AI relatively quickly.
>
> When I played Civ I for the very first time, I (as a Prince) built what I
> perceived to be a neat historic empire, of 5 cities. I was in peace with
> my neighbours until I decided to get a city off them. I built an "army"
> of 3 or so units. After my attack my army was massacred and the AI
> clamped down on me with quite some vigour. This experience put me off
> completely. I did not play Civ again until about 5 years later (not
> necessarily a bad thing of course :)
>
> 5 years later I was less pretentious and set the level to warlord, managed
> to get a couple of cities of my rather peaceful neighbours and noticed
> that more cities I have, better the units I can build. Then I read
> Civilopedia and eventually grew to kick AI at Deity.
>
> The point is, to learn you need to win at least once (or to read the
> strategy guides). Survival alone, as a puny empire of 3 cities, won't
> teach you a thing.
Could we have an "Advisor" mode?
If the AI can look over the players shoulder, and occasionally
popup a hint, that may help new players.
It would also mean that our (highlevel?) AI code would need to have
textual rationalizations/explanations throughout it's code, which
may be useful for AI tuners, and for possible API's between various
levels of the AI.
--
\_ banjo
</' banjo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
/) http://banjo.actrix.com/blog/
(/ Structure is strategy in slow motion!
`
|
|