Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: May 2002:
[aclug-L] Re: Northrock 14 Digital Projector / Star Wars: Episode II- At
Home

[aclug-L] Re: Northrock 14 Digital Projector / Star Wars: Episode II- At

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: Northrock 14 Digital Projector / Star Wars: Episode II- Attack of the Clones
From: Jonathan Hall <jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 16:46:45 -0500
Reply-to: discussion@xxxxxxxxx

I saw it on the digital screen on Thursday.  I watched it at midnight at the
Warren first, though.

Although it didn't seem dark to me at Northrock, it was a very crappy
experience compared to the Warren.  The sound quality was far superior at
the Warren, and I found the pixelization at Northrock to be annoying.

I heard someone (apparantly a manager) at the Warren explaining to some
patrons around 10:30pm (while waiting for Thursday to roll around) that the
Warren chose not to install a digital projector for that very reason.  I'm
glad the Warren chose not to.  If it's annoying at Northrock on a small
crappy screen, then at the Warren on a 4-story screen, it would be even
worse.

Word to the wise:  Anyone who has not yet seen Episode II, don't see it
anywhere except one of the Warren theaters!

-- Jonathan



On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 04:33:24PM -0500, David Carmichael wrote:
> 
> Just got home from seeing the 12 noon (05/17/02) showing of Star Wars:
> Episode II- Attack of the Clones with their new digital projector and my
> wife and I have to ask a question... is the movie really that dark?  Its
> like somebody needed to turn up the contrast or brightness because there
> were many scenes where we could not make out the main actors faces and where
> the "JEDI" robes that should of been a dark brown looked black.
> 
> IF it was not due to where I was sitting I think that I might of gotten up
> and said something about how dark the picture was during the showing... but
> the couple sitting to the right of me said something about the dark picture
> to each other and the young kids sitting in front of me also said something
> to each other.
> 
> Now maybe the images found on the web of a number of the scenes that I have
> seen come to mind might of  had the brightness increased due to the direct
> viewing of the computer monitor?? But due to this one kind of expected the
> images on the screen to be just as bright.
> 
> My wife and I have gone to the Northrock 6/14 a number of times the past
> year.. we really don't know what to think about the way that the movies that
> we have seen were being displayed. (going back a few weeks when the movie
> "The Scorpion King" was released the audio playback was messed up and
> sounded 'MONO' (note: said something to Jim [the manager] who at the time
> was banging on the west popcorn popper.)
> 
> --David
> 
> 
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi

--
Remember folks.  Street lights timed for 35 mph are also timed for 70
mph.  -Jim Samuels
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx  *  PGP public key available
 Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (620) 367-2487
         http://www.futureks.net/  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
                  -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux  =-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]