[aclug-L] Re: F**MYA**YOUP***Y

["John Alexander" <johnalexander@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

If it's technically feasible, I'd agree with James. The increasing frequency
of these posts alarms me, as we have many underage subscribers, and, as
recently demonstrated, the list is archived, so there is no telling who sees
these posts, and who they might hold responsible.

ja

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of james l
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 1:43 PM
To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: F**MYA**YOUP***Y




> Dale,
>
> It's sad that it would come to that. However, it wouldn't bother me to
post
> only from a subscribed address. I worry that with everyones' busy lives
> moderating the list would slow it down. I tend to just shake my head and
> delete the spam, so the status quo works for me too.
>
> wayne
>
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


I suggest that we either keep it the way it is, or do it this way:

Un-moderated for anyone sending from a subscribed address, and moderated
from
other addresses.

That way it would be faster, and no one would have to waste tons of time
moderating all the messages

James L

personally, the spam doesn't bug me that much, because hitting delete is
easy.
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi