[aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
They give free installation and hardware with any one-year contract.
Period. Regardless of whatever "promos" or "specials" they're offering.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 03:33:41PM -0500, John Alexander wrote:
> Here's the funny part:
> I ordered Business Class DSL today (32 static, 29 usable, thank you very
> much), got the same promo, which includes free connection hardware.
>
> ja
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ssaner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:ssaner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Steven Saner
> > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 10:36 AM
> > To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?
> >
> >
> > You pretty much have it figured out :-/
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 08:57:02AM -0500, Bates, Rod wrote:
> > > Whoooooa!
> > >
> > > Clint Brubakken wrote:
> > >
> > > >If you sign up before April 30, and you agree to sign a one year
> > > >contract and use SWBI, installation ($200) and isp service is free
> > > >($10/month)
> > >
> > > (and others said things to the same effect.)
> > >
> > > So as I understand it:
> > >
> > > 1. You need DSL service and ISP service
> > > 2. It costs somebody to provide ISP service
> > > 3. There is competition in the ISP business
> > > 4. SWB is the only game in town for DSL.
> > > 5. If you take ISP service from SWBI, then SWB will actually
> > > charge less for DSL as if you get ISP service from Southwind.
> > > (same monthly, no installation)
> > >
> > > This sounds like a classic monopolistic cross subsidy.
> > > Cut your prices below your costs (actually prices cut to zero
> > > for SWBI ISP service) in a businessline where you have
> > > competition. Make up your losses from a different line of
> > > business where you have none. Southwind has no comparable
> > > source of revenue they could use to make up comparable
> > > losses. Do the regulators know about this? Have I missed
> > > something?
> > >
> > > Rodney Bates
> > >
> > > -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
> > > visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
> >
> > -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
> > visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
> >
>
>
>
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
> visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
--
A man in Johannesburg, South Africa, shot his 49-year-old friend in the
face, seriously wounding him, while the two practiced shooting beer cans off
each other's head.
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Jonathan Hall * jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx * PGP public key available
Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (316) 367-2487
http://www.futureks.net * PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
-= Running Debian GNU/Linux =-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Monopoly tactics?, Bates, Rod, 2000/04/28
- [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?, Steven Saner, 2000/04/28
- [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?, John Alexander, 2000/04/28
- [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?, Clint A. Brubakken, 2000/04/28
- [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?, Lee and Chris Weathers, 2000/04/28
- [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?, Steven Saner, 2000/04/28
- [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?, Lee and Chris Weathers, 2000/04/29
- [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?, Lee and Chris Weathers, 2000/04/30
- [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?, Jonathan Hall, 2000/04/28
- [aclug-L] Re: Monopoly tactics?,
Jonathan Hall <=
|
|