Re: [aclug-L] Debian package management
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
"Greg House" <ghouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >The easiest way to do this is to snag the tgz for your particular
> >server from www.xfree86.org, place it in /usr/local/bin, and update
> >/etc/X11/Xserver to use it.
>
> Yeah, looking back, I should have just done that.
:-)
> >libc6 == glibc2 (aka glibc)
>
> DOH! Man do I feel like a dope now.
That's ok, I've had instances where I've spent lots of time
troubleshooting an intermittent null-modem PPP connection, only to
find out that the cable was loose and wasn't communicating half the
time :-)
> Yeah, I figured that one out. But it has a bunch more options and the man
> page for it has this big warning at the start of it saying it's totally out
> of date and probably inaccurate and that you should really be using dselect
> anyway. That kind of scared me off.
Hmm, mine doesn't say that. Maybe it's been updated :-)
> >dpkg -i *.deb
> >
> >wiill do it :-)
>
> What about dependancies & older versions? Will it do an upgrade of an
> existing package with -i or do you have to go remove the older package
> before installing the newer one?
Yes, it will do an upgrade for you. It will also refuse to install if
the package depends on certain others.
Actually, that's a bit of a lie. (Skip this paragraph if it's
confusing..) Technically, it will copy the files on to the disk but
not configure the package; after you've met all the dependencies, you
can run "dpkg --pending --configure".
If you try to install a package and it depends on things that you
don't have, fetch them, use dpkg -i on them, and then try dpkg -i
again.
Better yet, use apt; it will automatically resolve dependencies and
install things in the correct order for you.
> Now...figuring all that out still didn't really help me a whole lot. It
> seems Vincent's debs had a whole rash of dependancies. I started fetchinig
Well, the trouble is, that they are based on a distribution two
versions greater than yours. (Ie, potato, I believe, which is the
development tree for 3.0, due out this fall.) It should work pretty
well on a Slink system though (prerelease of 2.1, due out on March
9).
> the debs from the unstable tree for the things it complained about until I
> finally got stuck in a dependancy deadlock. When I tried to put one of them
Which packages are involved here? You may be better off using things
from "slink" -- it's really close to release. unstable stuff can be,
well, unstable :-)
If you let me know which specific packages are involved, or better
yet, the exact error messages, and I can find out what's going on.
Out of about 2500 packages in potato, it's a bit hard to guess :-)
> in, something else complained that it depended on the OLD version of the
> package and I couldn't find an updated version of that out there. So I
> threw up my hands in frustration and reverted back to the stuff on the
> original distribution and swapped video cards
>
> (I later found a mail message from a very kind ACLUG member offering to
> trade me a card better suited to this system for the Diamond card! This
> list is great!)
Glad to hear it!
-- John
---
This is the Air Capital Linux Users Group discussion list. If you
want to unsubscribe, send the word "unsubscribe" to
aclug-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx. If you want to post to the list, send your
message to aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx.
- [aclug-L] Debian package management, Greg House, 1999/03/02
- Re: [aclug-L] Debian package management, Greg House, 1999/03/04
- Re: [aclug-L] Debian package management, Greg House, 1999/03/04
- Re: [aclug-L] Debian package management, Greg House, 1999/03/07
- Re: [aclug-L] Debian package management,
John Goerzen <=
- Re: [aclug-L] Debian package management, Greg House, 1999/03/08
- RE: [aclug-L] Debian package management, John Alexander, 1999/03/08
|
|