[webdev] Re: software platform
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
I have been watching this discussion unfold. It does not matter to me
which way we go. Let me know how I can help.
Tom Hull wrote:
>I've been having some private discussions with Dale Hodge about the
>relative merits and demerits of the two ACLUG website prototypes:
> http://aclug.notwerk.net/ (aka openacs)
> http://aclug.neuralmatrix.org/ (aka postnuke)
>I've come to the conclusion that the best way to move forward from
>this point would be to switch to the postnuke software platform.
>My main reasons for this conclusion are:
> 1) The amount of work needed to get openacs up to an acceptable
> level of functionality is significantly greater.
> 2) The amount of work that the group has been willing to do on
> openacs to date is clearly inadequate.
> 3) My own level of participation is being seriously limited by
> other commitments, which has hampered us to date and is only
> likely to get worse.
>I'm sorry about this. I still think that there are is a lot of
>value in openacs that will be very hard to duplicate in postnuke.
>(But there are also things in postnuke that have proven difficult
>to duplicate in openacs.) If anyone wishes to argue with this
>conclusion/recommendation, like, speak now. Same for questions.
>If this meets with general approval, I'll make some suggestions
>on how to proceed with postnuke in a future mail.
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- [webdev] Re: software platform,
James Violette <=