[PATCH] Re: Prepare dynamic plugins (again)

[Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

( Re-adding the mailing list to the cc list; I believe the strip when
  mailing me is not voluntary. )

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 05:15:33PM +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 17:00 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:55:37PM +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
> > > 
> > > Done. I've sent it to you. I guess the latest corruption was mutts
> > > mis-detection of utf-8 (it set iso-8859-15 in the header).
> > 
> > It could really be that. The patch sent directly to me is fine.
> 
> Nice to hear that.

Could you try to re-send it (with utf-8 set) to the list or the previous
mail (with iso-8859-15) to me?

I think it will help to know exactly where is the problem.

> > >                                                            But again, I
> > > am wondering why sending directly to me, saving as mailbox and applying
> > > works fine ...
> > 
> > I'm not sure but denpending of what kind of "saving as mailbox"
> > operation you do and configuration you have, mutt may decode the mail
> > while saving.
> > 
> > > Btw: I would use git-send-email, but that tool seems not to exist
> > > anymore in git 1.6
> > 
> > I'm sure send-email exists in the whole 1.6 series of Git. I do follow
> > the development of Git, use the "unreleased yet next" branch and send
> > patches myself sometimes. Do you use the vanilla git from an official
> > repository or a package from your linux distribution. Or maybe a port of
> > Git to another OS?
> 
> Just found it. It's a subpackage in fedora (and those are not listed in
> the packagedb).

Odd. I don't know what is a subpackage in Fedora. I believe it's not the
official packages tree? If so, does falling back to the Fedora's
official package of Git help? I don't understand why Fedora would want
to strip send-email from their Git package.

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht