New message preservation
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Any insight on "fixing" the management of UNSEEN flags, as outlined
below? Are "new message" flags working fine for everyone else?
-- begin --
I'm a brand new offlineimap user, running Debian 3.99.1 against a
remote Courier-IMAP.
I'm pleased so far; the migration went smoothly enough for it to take
me a number of hours to notice the only real problem I've had.
I've basically lost all management of "new" messages (IMAP Unseen
status, I think). Mail is delivered to my remote server fine; if I
don't pull the message, then new messages are marked unseen, and when
I point my mail user agent at the server and fetch new messages, they
have a "new" mark, and the mail reader jumps to the new messages..
When the messages are pulled to my local server via offlineimap, and I
point my user agent at the local maildir, there are no new message
markers, so it's harder to read my inboxes.
I haven't traced the exact sequence yet. Perhaps when offlineimap
pulls the new messages, they are pulled with the unseen flag. But
then my remote server marked them as seen, so the _next_ sync, they
get marked seen locally.
So you may be thinking "of course, everything is working properly".
But maybe it's not. I was surprised that I didn't see any messages in
the mail archives on this topic, so I may be unique in this.
I could bang my head on this a little bit, but I'd rather get guidance
from the experts here. Has anyone else experienced this issue? Is it
considered a problem? When exactly are my local files been marked as
seen? Is offlineimap working the best that it can? Are there any
technically-incorrect-but-possibly-useful hacks that could be added to
keep that seen bit long enough for it to make it to my MUA?
Thanks for any help. I'd _really_ like to use offlineimap, but I'm
feeling a productivity hit with the loss of my "new messages"
functionality.
-- end --
- New message preservation,
Jared Rhine <=
|
|