[gopher] Re: Gopherness
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Jay Nemrow <jnemrow@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think the ultimate fate of the protocol is very much
> an important thing to discuss here.
This discussion is not about the fate of the protocol (as far as I can
tell, the RFC will not bitrot for some time now). It is about creating
a new protocol and I don't care to read about it.
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Nuno J. Silva, 2008/08/03
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Hugh Guiney, 2008/08/03
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Cameron Kaiser, 2008/08/03
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Kyevan, 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Jay Nemrow, 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Avery M., 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Jay Nemrow, 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Avery M., 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Jay Nemrow, 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness,
Avery M. <=
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Kyevan, 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Jay Nemrow, 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/08/09
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Nuno J. Silva, 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Matthew Holevinski, 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Nuno J. Silva, 2008/08/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/08/09
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, John Goerzen, 2008/08/10
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Nuno J. Silva, 2008/08/10
- [gopher] Re: Gopherness, Matthew Holevinski, 2008/08/10
|
|