[gopher] Re: Gopherness

["Avery M." <averym@xxxxxxxxx>]

I don't think the Gopher network would benefit from balkanization at
this late stage.

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Jay Nemrow <jnemrow@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would also be a bit concerned about backward-compatibility (as I
> always am).  When we talk about changes like this, I suggest we call
> the protocol created with modern changes something besides just
> "Gopher".  Perhaps Goph08 or something like that.  Then you could say,
> "hey, I run a Goph08 server" or "my client is both Gopher and Goph08
> compatible."