[gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc.
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
JumpJet Mailbox wrote:
> I am absolutely, 100%, AGAINST the idea of Upper / Lower case letters
> indicating different Item Types. Although this may be acceptable for some
> computer platforms (upper and lower case letters do have different ASCII
> values), it is a real annoyance on others. As protocols must be universal,
> "case neutrality" should be the only acceptable method.
I am unaware of any current platform that is both capable of TCP
communication and incapable of making a case-sensitive comparison at the
protocol level.
Even EBCBDIC platforms can do this.
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., (continued)
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc.,
John Goerzen <=
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/07/04
- [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc., Roman Pavlov, 2008/07/05
|
|