Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: gopher: August 2007:
[gopher] Re: Problem with SiMpLeMaChInEs
Home

[gopher] Re: Problem with SiMpLeMaChInEs

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gopher] Re: Problem with SiMpLeMaChInEs
From: Mark <mark@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:33:25 +0200
Reply-to: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx

brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Also, the word "should" doesn't mandate compliance. It's a
> recommendation.
>   
I agree; that's why it's called an RFC and not something else. :)

The port 70 discussion started because someone forwarded their port 70
internet to a different port on LAN? My idea about this, is that it is
never a good idea to run a service on a different internal port than
it's external port. This because it's a definite way to show
difficulties like the one being discussed now. A rather pointless
discussion anyway, imho. :)

--Mark



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]