Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: gopher: April 2002:
[gopher] Re: Pygopherd nearing gopherd replacement
Home

[gopher] Re: Pygopherd nearing gopherd replacement

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gopher] Re: Pygopherd nearing gopherd replacement
From: "Timm Murray" <hardburn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 03:47:12 GMT
Reply-to: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx

<>
> That said, there is no noticeable difference between pygopherd and=20
> gopherd except when rendering very large (hundreds or thousands of=20
> items) UMN-style (dynamically-generated) directories.=20=20
<>

Python saves the compiled output of the script after the first run, so new =
runs of the=20
script should run at near native speeds anyway.


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]