Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: gopher: December 2001:
[gopher] Re: overriding portions of the http protocol?
Home

[gopher] Re: overriding portions of the http protocol?

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: lindner@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gopher] Re: overriding portions of the http protocol?
From: Paul Lindner <lindner@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:17:26 -0800
Reply-to: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:37:27PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Paul Lindner <lindner@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > It looks like it won't be too hard to use Apache as a generic protocol
> > engine.  We should be able to use much of the Apache code base to make
> > a very nice server.  For example we can eliminate all the logging and
> > much of the authentication code right off the bat..
> 
> Yes, that sounds very, very nice.

Apache 2.0, amen.

> > CVS password: 
> > cvs [login aborted]: recv() from server pi.complete.org: Connection reset 
> > by peer
> 
> I'll look into the logs...  This may have been you:
[....]
> Dec 19 15:25:28 pi cvs-pserver[8649]: refused connect from
> 209.0.105.71
> 
> You might have a bad reverse resolve for your host.  If you can't get
> it fixed, let me know and I'll add an exception to the wrapper rules.

Sadly I don't have control over my reverse zone...  One of these
days...  Could you add 209.0.105.70-73 to your tcp wrapper exceptions?
thanks.


-- 
Paul Lindner    lindner@xxxxxxxxx   ||||| | | | |  |  |  |   |   |

    mod_perl Developer's Cookbook   http://www.modperlcookbook.org
         Human Rights Declaration   http://www.unhchr.ch/udhr/index.htm


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]