Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv: August 2000:
[Freeciv] Re: [Fwd: eternal wonders,]
Home

[Freeciv] Re: [Fwd: eternal wonders,]

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv] Re: [Fwd: eternal wonders,]
From: Ed Cogburn <ecogburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 06:48:30 -0400

michael.hasselmann@xxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > > > Nicolas Brunel wrote:
> > > > A rule like this one can help to balance the game.
> 
> You're both absolutely right - that's why I'd like to play without any
> wonders at all.  Sadly, there's no official freeciv-server for this, so
> I'll probably going to set up one myself ( at least for a test game ;-)


        I like the idea of a no-wonder option too.  In a game where most of
the wonders are being built by 1 or 2 nations, that generally dooms
everyone else.  Another reason is the wonders are a direct copy of Civ
wonders.  If Hasbro ever decides to squash us, a no-wonders option
combined with other options like a generic tech level tree would give
FC some legitimacy, ie, keep the Civ'isms to a minimum.  Just thinking
of FC's long term future ... because I want it to have a long term
future.  :-)


-- 
"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire

Ed C.



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]
  • [Freeciv] Re: [Fwd: eternal wonders,], Ed Cogburn <=