Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-java: November 1998:
[FreeCiv-Java] Status

[FreeCiv-Java] Status

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-java@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [FreeCiv-Java] Status
From: Esben Haabendal Soerensen <ehs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 20:41:35 +0100 (MET)

Hi (John)

Did you incorporate my changes ?
I could not find a v0.005 on

I am a little confused about how this patch thingy is meant
to work paralel to the CVS.

It seems like you (freeciv dudes) use sending patchfiles much
more than comitting to CVS.  Why is that ?

It seems like a much more tedious task than doing a cvs commit.

Another question:  Who has write access to the freeciv cvs ?
Anyone ?

Regarding status:

As I see it our current phase is the design and framework coding phase
(phase 1), and in this phase it seems like a good idea that we are only
us two.  If we were o many people we would never get a proposal out there :-)

But for this phase to proceed as quickly as possible I think we should
use the CVS server as the distribution method.
No need to send patch files around, when we are only us two.
This might result in a lot of commits, and the cvs root might be
littered with minor versions, but we could just start over again
when we begin the next phase.

Next week:

I am going to London this sunday.  Returning on thursday.
So I will not be able to do anything before end of next week.

/Esben  (bart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

: But for some things, Perl just isn't the optimal choice.

(yet)   :-)
             -- Larry Wall in <199702221943.LAA20388@xxxxxxxx>

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]