[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#13247) national boundaries do not deter aggression
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=13247 >
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:47:04PM -0700, sds@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 1. crossing a national boundary with a military unit is _always_ an
> act of war (requires cancelling treaty &c).
> exception: sea (ships can travel everywhere) and aircraft (but not
> helicopters)
Entering should be grounds for war, but not require war: so, not automatic
war, but you don't lose reputation if you declare war.
Entering national waters and airspace is usually an act of agression in the
real world, so I don't see the need for a special case here.
> 2. crossing a national boundary with a non-military unit is allowed only
> if there is a special treaty "welcome travellers" (like "map exchange").
How about just a peace treaty (so you can send caravans, for instance).
To make this work, I think we need smaller borders -- 3 or 4 rather than 7
by default.
-- Benoît
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#13247) national boundaries do not deter aggression,
Benoit Hudson <=
|
|