Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: November 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6707) Announce server on LAN
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6707) Announce server on LAN

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: andrearo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6707) Announce server on LAN
From: "Raimar Falke" <i-freeciv-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:50:11 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:32:36AM -0800, Paul Zastoupil wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:22:49AM -0800, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:07:22AM -0800, Paul Zastoupil wrote:
> > > The advantage is that its the right thing to do.  Why bother using
> > > multicast if its just going to broadcast the message?  Why bother with
> > > multicast when your effectively sending a packet to 255.255.255.255? 
> > 
> > Same question for you: how do I join a multicast group with minimal
> > effort (code and dependency wise)? I have no idea about this. It may
> > possible but what I read till now didn't convinced me yet.
> 
> Then why bother using multicast?

Good question. Andreas?

One advantage would be that you can control the propagation with the
multicast group control. This isn't possible with broadcast.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "Python is executable pseudocode. Perl is executable line noise"
    -- Bruce Eckel



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]